The best retcon in the history of comic books

If you follow news about comic books, no doubt you've heard about the "Brand New Day" reboot Marvel Comics is performing on Spider-Man. Spidey's beloved Aunt May is in a coma, on the verge of death and, in order to bring her back, the Web Slinger shakes hands with the devil--in the shape of the Mephisto.

Mephisto makes good on his part of the deal, but in the process Peter Parker's life has been reset. He's no longer married to Mary Jane Watson, he's a 20-something bachelor living with his aunt. Essentially everything's back to the way it was back in the Stan Lee-John Romita days or, probably what Marvel is really after, just like it is in the Spider-Man movies.

It all happens in Amazing Spider-Man 545 and there's loads of Web and mainstream media press about it. And, naturally, lots of longtime fans aren't too happy about it.

Me, I don't really care. I haven't read a new Spidey comic in years and years, so I'm not vested in all that continuity that's being wiped out. But I do get frustrated with all the hype and controversy these retcons/reboots generate. I just don't see the point (well, I do see the point of publishers wanting to generate sales with the cheap stunt of arbitrarily changing the status quo from time to time).

Why not just continue working with what you have? Quit playing with the pieces of the past, and tell Spider-Man stories. Don't like some aspect of past continuity? Ignore it. But why bother confusing new and old readers by relentlessly tinkering and finding silly ways to change the past or wipe it out?

These situations always make me think of what I think is the best, most effective, example of comics creators resetting a character and series: That of the 1970s Batman.

After years of campy, silly plots that both inspired and were inspired by the 1960s "Batman" TV series, it was felt Batman should be brought back to basics: Make him a dark avenger of the night again. Dispense with Robin and all the Bat gimmicks. Make Batman a non-powered guy in a costume with nothing to fall back on but his wits.

And, you know what? Writer Frank Robbins and artist Irv Novick made the change in five pages of an in-continuity issue: Batman #127 in 1969 with the story "One Bullet Too Many."

In the first three pages a glum Bruce Wayne and Alfred ship Dick Grayson off to college. Then, once Dick's out the door, Bruce announces "It's time we all started a new way of life! A new way of everything!" He's shutting up the Batcave. He's streamling and getting rid of all the Batgadgets and he's ditching stately Wayne Manor for a pad in the Gotham City, where he'll be in closer thumping distance of criminals.

Blam! "This is the way things are now," the readers are told. And then it's straight into that issue's main plot. No big mini-series or crossover event. No big cosmic event or crisis. No big nothing. Just a clear statement that "we're changing direction now."

The whole thing is a splendid model of how to change the course of a character or series.



3 comments:

  1. I completely agree! That BATMAN story surprised me at the time it came out but I enjoyed the new sportscar, the ROBIN solo stories and, soon enough, O'Neil/Adams (although Novick was THE Bat-artist for me at that time!). As for Spidey, if you've got a great story-line for the Spider-Mobile (for example) tell it! If not, ignore it!Continuity buff though I am, I sometimes think the current creators forget that it's ALL FICTION!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember being a 12 year old kid and being upset with the changes of the elimination of the Batcave and Robin... but then we were given the Darker Batman by Neal Adams it became very easy to forgive. The book really stepped up in quality and I REALLY looked forward to it every month. Plus it did make more sense to have Bruce Wayne "in the middle of the action" by moving him to into Gotham City, rather than in the surburbs.
    Instead of a 'deal with the Devil', the Spider-man people should of just started continuity over again.. but didn't they do that with the Ultimate Spider-man books? I haven't read Spidey in 12 years (too many monthly books, too little money and time), so I don't have a clue, didn't really care either and I guess it shows. One more question: is this going to effect the comic strip which always seem to also be in a continuity of its own. - hcc

    ReplyDelete
  3. Remember "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow" story that wrapped up the Decades of Superman Continuity and gave the Silver Age Superman a happy ending, paving the way for a whole new beginning. Why didn't Marvel just do that with Spidey. You think they would of take advantage to create a series of Number Ones and just start the numbering over again.
    Maybe this way if it doesn't work, Peter and just take a shower one day (Dallas) and find everything back if it doesn't help sales.

    ReplyDelete